Horizontal (automatic) and vertical (control) processes have been observed and reported for a long time in translation production. Schaeffer and Carl's Monitor Model integrates these two processes into one framework, assuming that priming mechanisms underlie horizontal/automatic processes, while vertical/monitoring processes implement consciously accessible control mechanisms. The Monitor Model has been criticized in various ways and several misconceptions have accumulated over the past years. In this chapter, I update the Monitor Model with additional evidence and argue that it is compatible with an enactivist approach to cognition. I address several misconceptions related to the Monitor Model.
翻译:横向(自动)和纵向(控制)程序在翻译制作过程中已观察到并报告很长时间。Schaeffer和Carl的《监测模型》将这两个程序合并为一个框架,假设横向/自动程序背后的顶尖机制是横向/自动程序,而纵向/监测程序有意识地实施可获取的控制机制。《监测模型》受到各种批评,过去几年来积累了多种误解。在本章中,我用更多证据更新了《监测模型》,认为它与对认知的成文法方法相容。我谈到了与《监测模型》有关的若干误解。