We examine the case of items with a limited shelf-life where storing an item (before consumption) may carry a cost to a buyer (or distributor). For example, eggs, milk, or Groupon coupons have a fixed expiry date, and seasonal goods can suffer a decrease in value. We show how this setting contrasts with recent results by Berbeglia et al (arXiv:1509.07330(v5)) for items with infinite shelf-life. We prove tight bounds on the seller's profits showing how they relate to the items' shelf-life. We show, counterintuitively, that in our limited shelf-life setting, increasing storage costs can sometimes lead to less profit for the seller which cannot happen when items have unlimited shelf-life. We also provide an algorithm that calculates optimal prices. Finally, we examine empirically the relationship between profits and buyer utility as the storage cost and shelf-life duration change, and observe properties, some of which are unique to the limited shelf-life setting.
翻译:我们研究储存物品(在消费前)可能给买方(或经销商)带来成本的有限保存期限的物品的情况,例如,鸡蛋、牛奶或Groupon优惠券有一个固定的到期日,季节性货物的价值可能会下降。我们展示这种环境与Berbeglia等人(arXiv:1509.07330(v5))最近对无限保存期限的物品的结果有何不同。我们证明卖方利润的严格界限表明它们与物品的保存期限有何关系。我们直觉地表明,在我们有限的保存期限的设置中,增加储存费用有时会减少卖方的利润,而当物品具有无限的保存期限时,则不会发生这种情况。我们还提供了一种计算最佳价格的算法。最后,我们从经验上研究利润和买方效用之间的关系作为储存成本和保存期限的变化,并观察某些特性,这些特性对于有限的保存期限是独一无二的。