Driving is an intuitive task that requires skills, constant alertness and vigilance for unexpected events. The driving task also requires long concentration spans focusing on the entire task for prolonged periods, and sophisticated negotiation skills with other road users, including wild animals. These requirements are particularly important when approaching intersections, overtaking, giving way, merging, turning and while adhering to the vast body of road rules. Modern motor vehicles now include an array of smart assistive and autonomous driving systems capable of subsuming some, most, or in limited cases, all of the driving task. The UK Department of Transport's response to the Safe Use of Automated Lane Keeping System consultation proposes that these systems are tested for compliance with relevant traffic rules. Building these smart automotive systems requires software developers with highly technical software engineering skills, and now a lawyer's in-depth knowledge of traffic legislation as well. These skills are required to ensure the systems are able to safely perform their tasks while being observant of the law. This paper presents an approach for deconstructing the complicated legalese of traffic law and representing its requirements and flow. The approach (de)constructs road rules in legal terminology and specifies them in structured English logic that is expressed as Boolean logic for automation and Lawmaps for visualisation. We demonstrate an example using these tools leading to the construction and validation of a Bayesian Network model. We strongly believe these tools to be approachable by programmers and the general public, and capable of use in developing Artificial Intelligence to underpin motor vehicle smart systems, and in validation to ensure these systems are considerate of the law when making decisions.
翻译:驾驶是一项直觉的任务,需要技能、不断保持警惕和警惕意外事件。驾驶任务还要求长时间集中关注整个任务,并与包括野生动物在内的其他道路使用者进行复杂的谈判技能。这些要求在接近交叉路口、超越、让路、合并、转弯和遵守庞大的公路规则方面特别重要。现代机动车辆现在包括一系列智能辅助和自主的驾驶系统,这些系统能够将大部分或有限情况下的所有驾驶任务都归并起来。联合王国运输部对自动通道保持系统安全使用协商的反应建议对这些系统进行测试,以遵守相关的交通规则。建设这些智能汽车系统需要具有高技术软件工程技能的软件开发者,现在也需要律师对交通法规的深入了解。这些技能是为了确保这些系统能够在遵守法律范本的同时安全地执行任务。本文提出了一种方法,用于解析复杂的公共交通法律的论证,并代表其要求和流动。我们用这些逻辑和视觉化的方法在法律术语和逻辑化中以逻辑化和逻辑化为榜样,用这些逻辑化工具展示了这些逻辑化和逻辑化的逻辑化工具,以展示了这些逻辑化和逻辑化工具,以展示了这些逻辑化为榜样,以展示了这些逻辑和逻辑化工具,以展示了这些逻辑化工具,以展示了这些逻辑和逻辑化工具来进行法律的逻辑化,以展示了这些逻辑化,以展示了这些逻辑化,以展示了这些逻辑化为法律的逻辑和逻辑化工具以展示了这些逻辑化工具以展示了建筑法的逻辑和逻辑化工具以展示了这些逻辑化工具,以展示了这些逻辑化工具以法律的逻辑化工具以展示了这些逻辑化为术语和建筑法。