This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. In recent discussions of fairness in computer science, some have maintained that independence is not a suitable measure of group fairness. This position is at least partially based on two influential papers (Dwork et al., 2012, Hardt et al., 2016) that provide arguments against independence. We revisit these arguments, and we find that the case against independence is rather weak. We also give arguments in favor of independence, showing that it plays a distinctive role in considerations of fairness. Finally, we discuss how to balance different fairness considerations.
翻译:本文件批判性地审视了反对独立的论点,独立是群体公平的一种衡量标准,也称为统计均等和人口均等。在最近关于计算机科学公平性的讨论中,一些人认为独立不是适当的群体公平性衡量标准。这一立场至少部分地基于两份有影响力的文件(Dwork等人,2012年;Hardt等人,2016年),其中提出了反对独立的论点。我们重新审视了这些论点,发现反对独立的理由相当薄弱。我们也提出赞成独立的论点,表明独立在公平性考虑中发挥着独特的作用。最后,我们讨论如何平衡不同的公平考虑。