In recent years, increased stakeholder pressure to transition research to Open Access has led to many journals converting, or 'flipping', from a closed access (CA) to an open access (OA) publishing model. Changing the publishing model can influence the decision of authors to submit their papers to a journal, and increased article accessibility may influence citation behaviour. In this paper we aimed to understand how flipping a journal to an OA model influences the journal's future publication volumes and citation impact. We analysed two independent sets of journals that had flipped to an OA model, one from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and one from the Open Access Directory (OAD), and compared their development with two respective control groups of similar journals. For bibliometric analyses, journals were matched to the Scopus database. We assessed changes in the number of articles published over time, as well as two citation metrics at the journal and article level: the normalised impact factor (IF) and the average relative citations (ARC), respectively. Our results show that overall, journals that flipped to an OA model increased their publication output compared to journals that remained closed. Mean normalised IF and ARC also generally increased following the flip to an OA model, at a greater rate than was observed in the control groups. However, the changes appear to vary largely by scientific discipline. Overall, these results indicate that flipping to an OA publishing model can bring positive changes to a journal.
翻译:近年来,利益攸关方向开放存取研究过渡的压力增加,导致许多期刊从封闭存取(CA)到开放存取(OAA)出版模式(OA)转换或“翻转”。改变出版模式可以影响作者将其论文提交杂志的决定,增加文章的可读性可能会影响引用行为。在本论文中,我们旨在了解将期刊翻转至OA模式如何影响该期刊的未来出版量和引文影响。我们分析了两套转至OA模式的独立的期刊,一套来自《开放存取日记目录》(DOAJ),另一套来自开放存取目录(OAAAD),将其发展与两个类似期刊的控制组进行比较。对于书本分析分析而言,期刊与Scopus数据库相匹配。我们评估了将期刊转至OA模式的变化以及两套引用指标如何影响该期刊的未来出版量和文章层面:正常影响要素(IF)和平均相对引用(ARC)。我们的调查结果显示,总体而言,将OA模式翻换成OA模式的期刊产出比一般而言,OA结构更接近于正常地显示OA。