The paper investigates gender differences in entrepreneurship by exploiting a large-scale land lottery in Oklahoma at the turn of the 20$^{\text{th}}$ century. Lottery winners claimed land in the order in which their names were drawn, so the draw number is an approximate rank ordering of lottery wealth. This mechanism allows for the estimation of a dose-response function, which relates each draw number to the expected outcome under each draw. I estimate dose-response functions on a linked dataset of lottery winners and land patent records, and find the probability of purchasing land from the government to be decreasing as a function of lottery wealth, which is evidence for the presence of liquidity constraints. I find female winners were more effective in leveraging lottery wealth to purchase additional land, as evidenced by significantly higher median dose-responses compared to those of male winners. For a sample of winners linked to the 1910 Census, I find that male winners have higher median dose-responses compared to female winners in terms of farm or home ownership. These results suggest that liquidity constraints may have been more binding for female entrepreneurs in the market economy.
翻译:该文件调查了俄克拉荷马州在20元时利用大规模土地彩票在创业方面的性别差异。彩票赢家按照自己名字的顺序提出土地要求,因此抽取数是彩票财富的大致排序。这一机制可以估计剂量-反应功能,将每个抽取数与每支抽取的预期结果联系起来。我估计了彩票赢家和土地专利记录相关数据集的剂量-反应功能,并发现从政府购买土地的可能性会因彩票财富的功能而下降,这证明存在流动性限制。我发现女性赢家在利用彩票财富购买更多土地方面比男性赢家的中位剂量反应要高得多。关于1910年人口普查的赢家抽样,我发现男性赢家与女性赢家相比,在农场或家庭所有权方面有更高的中位剂量-反应。这些结果表明,流动性限制对市场经济中的女企业家可能更具约束力。