How do complex social systems evolve in the modern world? This question lies at the heart of social physics, and network analysis has proven critical in providing answers to it. In recent years, network analysis has also been used to gain a quantitative understanding of law as a complex adaptive system, but most research has focused on legal documents of a single type, and there exists no unified framework for quantitative legal document analysis using network analytical tools. Against this background, we present a comprehensive framework for analyzing legal documents as multi-dimensional, dynamic document networks. We demonstrate the utility of this framework by applying it to an original dataset of statutes and regulations from two different countries, the United States and Germany, spanning more than twenty years (1998-2019). Our framework provides tools for assessing the size and connectivity of the legal system as viewed through the lens of specific document collections as well as for tracking the evolution of individual legal documents over time. Implementing the framework for our dataset, we find that at the federal level, the United States legal system is increasingly dominated by regulations, whereas the German legal system remains governed by statutes. This holds regardless of whether we measure the systems at the macro, the meso, or the micro level.
翻译:在现代世界中,复杂的社会体系是如何演变的? 这个问题是社会物理学的核心所在,网络分析已证明是提供答案的关键。近年来,网络分析还被用来从数量上理解法律,作为一个复杂的适应系统,但大多数研究侧重于单一类型的法律文件,没有使用网络分析工具进行定量法律文件分析的统一框架。在这种背景下,我们提出了一个将法律文件分析为多维、动态文件网络的全面框架。我们通过将这一框架应用于美国和德国这两个不同国家的法规和条例的原始数据集,证明了这一框架的效用,这两国长达20多年(1998-2019年),我们的框架提供了工具,通过具体文件收集的透镜来评估法律系统的规模和连通性,并跟踪个别法律文件的演变情况。我们发现,在联邦一级,我们的数据集框架日益受到监管,而德国的法律制度仍然受法规的制约。无论我们是在宏观、中间还是微观层面衡量系统,这都是如此。