In the media, in policy-making, but also in research articles, algorithmic decision-making (ADM) systems are referred to as algorithms, artificial intelligence, and computer programs, amongst other terms. We hypothesize that such terminological differences can affect people's perceptions of properties of ADM systems, people's evaluations of systems in application contexts, and the replicability of research as findings may be influenced by terminological differences. In two studies (N = 397, N = 622), we show that terminology does indeed affect laypeople's perceptions of system properties (e.g., perceived complexity) and evaluations of systems (e.g., trust). Our findings highlight the need to be mindful when choosing terms to describe ADM systems, because terminology can have unintended consequences, and may impact the robustness and replicability of HCI research. Additionally, our findings indicate that terminology can be used strategically (e.g., in communication about ADM systems) to influence people's perceptions and evaluations of these systems.
翻译:在媒体、决策以及研究文章中,算法决策系统被称作算法、人工智能和计算机程序等术语。我们假设,这种术语差异可能影响人们对非数字数据系统特性的看法、人们对应用环境中的系统的评价以及研究结果的可复制性,因为其结果可能受术语差异的影响。在两项研究(N=397,N=622)中,我们显示术语确实影响到非普通人对系统特性(例如感知的复杂性)的看法和对系统的评价(例如信任)。我们的调查结果强调,在选择描述非数字数据系统时,需要注意术语,因为术语可能产生意想不到的后果,并可能影响HCI研究的稳健性和可复制性。此外,我们的研究结果表明,术语可以战略性地使用(例如在关于ADM系统的通信中)来影响人们对这些系统的看法和评价。