中美科学基金资助与知识生产比较研究

项目名称： 中美科学基金资助与知识生产比较研究

项目编号： No.71473219

项目类型： 面上项目

立项/批准年度： 2015

项目学科： 管理科学

项目作者： 周萍

作者单位： 浙江大学

项目金额： 61万元

中文摘要： 作为知识生产的重要成果，学术论文传递了除研究发现以外许多重要信息，其中的文献计量学信息为分析和测度知识生产状况、发展趋势、学术影响等提供了广阔的空间。随着我国经济实力的增强，政府以基金形式对科学研究的资助力度持续增强，但相较于大量申请需求而言，基金资源仍然有限：只有较为优秀的项目方能获得资助。如何在资源有限的情况下使资助发挥最大效益，是基金资助决策者面临的一种挑战。对于决策者而言，除自己探索有效途径外，向他国学习不失为一种捷径。作为全球知识生产的第一大国，美国在有效利用政府资助方面经验丰富，这些经验一定程度上可以通过资助重要成果形式- - 论文得以体现。本项目将用科学计量学手段和相关理论，以中美两国主要资助基础研究的基金所产生的论文为对象，从论文总体情况、地区分布、机构特点、国际合作以及刊载论文的期刊质量等视角展开系统的比较研究，为提高或完善我国科学基金资助效率提供决策参考。

中文关键词： 科技评价；科学计量学；科技管理

英文摘要： As an important form of outcome from knowledge production, academic publications convey a great deal of information except those of research findings. Bibliometric information, for instance, is a kind of important sources that can be applied to analyze and measure issues relevant to knowledge production, development, academic impact and value, and so on. With the growing strength of its national economy, China spends increasing amount of money to support science research. Nonetheless, compared to the huge demands of research proposals, funding sources are still limited. Only outperforming proposals can be supported. In general, how to maximize effect of limited funding resources is a great challenge faced by policy makers. In addition to exploring solutions by a country itself, learning from others is anyhow a shortcut. As a leader in knowledge production, the USA has accumulated rich experience in optimizing government funding effect. Such experience may, to some extent, be reflected in research outcome - journal publications. By applying bibliometric methodology and related theories, the current project will compare publications from China and the USA that were funded by major foundations supporting basic research in either country. Topics to be investigated include funded publications in general situation, regional distribution, institutional characteristics, international collaboration, as well as journals publishing publications from either country, so as to provide policy support for increasing or improving funding efficiency in science.

英文关键词： SCIENCE EVALUATION;BIBLIOMETRCS;SCIENCE MANAGEMENT