As organisations increasingly recognise data as a strategic resource, they face the challenge of translating informational assets into measurable business value. Existing valuation approaches remain fragmented, often separating economic, governance, and strategic perspectives and lacking operational mechanisms suitable for real settings. This paper introduces a unified valuation framework that integrates these perspectives into a coherent decision-support model. Building on two artefacts from the Horizon Europe DATAMITE project, a taxonomy of data-quality and performance metrics, and an Analytic Network Process (ANP) tool for deriving relative importance, we develop a hybrid valuation model. The model combines qualitative scoring, cost- and utility-based estimation, relevance/quality indexing, and multi-criteria weighting to define data value transparently and systematically. Anchored in the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), the framework aligns indicators and valuation outcomes with organisational strategy, enabling firms to assess monetisation potential across Data-as-a-Service, Information-as-a-Service, and Answers-as-a-Service pathways. Methodologically, the study follows a Design Science approach complemented by embedded case studies with industrial partners, which informed continual refinement of the model. Because the evaluation is connected to a high-level taxonomy, the approach also reveals how valuation considerations map to BSC perspectives. Across the analysed use cases, the framework demonstrated flexibility, transparency, and reduced arbitrariness in valuation, offering organisations a structured basis for linking data assets to strategic and economic outcomes.
翻译:随着组织日益认识到数据作为战略资源的重要性,它们面临着将信息资产转化为可衡量商业价值的挑战。现有的估值方法仍然零散,往往割裂了经济、治理和战略视角,且缺乏适用于实际场景的操作机制。本文提出一个统一的估值框架,将这些视角整合为一个连贯的决策支持模型。基于欧洲地平线DATAMITE项目的两个成果——数据质量与性能指标的分类体系,以及用于推导相对重要性的分析网络过程(ANP)工具,我们开发了一种混合估值模型。该模型结合了定性评分、基于成本与效用的估算、相关性/质量指数以及多准则加权,以透明且系统的方式定义数据价值。该框架以平衡计分卡(BSC)为锚点,将指标与估值结果与组织战略对齐,使企业能够评估数据即服务(Data-as-a-Service)、信息即服务(Information-as-a-Service)和答案即服务(Answers-as-a-Service)路径的货币化潜力。在方法论上,本研究遵循设计科学方法,并结合与工业合作伙伴的嵌入式案例研究,这些案例持续指导了模型的优化。由于评估与高层分类体系相关联,该方法还揭示了估值考量如何映射到BSC的各个视角。在分析的所有用例中,该框架展现了估值过程的灵活性、透明性并减少了随意性,为组织提供了将数据资产与战略及经济成果相连接的结构化基础。