Human resource management technologies have moved from biometric surveillance to emotional artificial intelligence (AI) that monitor employees' engagement and productivity, analyze video interviews and CVs of job applicants. The rise of the US$20 billion emotional AI industry will transform the future workplace. Yet, besides no international consensus on the principles or standards for such technologies, there is a lack of cross-cultural research on future job seekers' attitude toward such use of AI technologies. This study collects a cross-sectional dataset of 1,015 survey responses of international students from 48 countries and 8 regions worldwide. A majority of the respondents (52%) are concerned about being managed by AI. Following the hypothetico-deductivist philosophy of science, we use the MCMC Hamiltonian approach and conduct a detailed comparison of 10 Bayesian network models with the PSIS-LOO method. We consistently find having a higher income, being male, majoring in business, and/or self-rated familiarity with AI correlate with a more positive view of emotional AI in the workplace. There is also a stark cross-cultural and cross-regional difference. Our analysis shows people from economically less developed regions (Africa, Oceania, Central Asia) tend to exhibit less concern for AI managers. And for East Asian countries, 64% of the Japanese, 56% of the South Korean, and 42% of the Chinese professed the trusting attitude. In contrast, an overwhelming majority of 75% of the European and Northern American possesses the worrying/neutral attitude toward being managed by AI. Regarding religion, Muslim students correlate with the most concern toward emotional AI in the workplace. When religiosity is higher, the correlation becomes stronger for Muslim and Buddhist students.
翻译:人力资源管理技术已经从生物鉴别监测转向情感人工智能(AI),监测雇员的参与和生产率,分析视频采访和求职者的简历。200亿美元的情感人工智能产业的崛起将改变未来的工作场所。然而,除了没有就此类技术的原则或标准达成国际共识之外,对于未来求职者对使用人工智能技术的态度缺乏跨文化研究。这项研究收集了来自48个国家和8个世界区域的国际学生对1 015项调查的答复的跨部门数据集,这些调查来自48个国家和8个区域。大多数答复者(52%)都对AI的管理感到担忧。在科学理论的虚伪消减主义哲学之后,我们采用了MMC Hamiltonian方法,并详细比较了10个巴耶西亚网络模式与PSIS-LO方法的对比。我们一直发现,收入较高,男性是男性,主要在商业领域,以及(或)自认熟悉AI与更积极的工作场所的情感互换关系。还有明显的跨文化和跨区域差异。我们的分析显示,来自经济欠发达地区的人们对42个区域(非洲、大洋洲、中亚、中亚)的相对性比例为75。