There have been many claims in the media and a bit of respectable research about the causes of variation in firearm sales. The challenges for causal inference can be quite daunting. This paper reports an analysis of daily handgun sales in California from 1996 through 2018 using an interrupted time series design and analysis. The design was introduced to social scientists in 1963 by Campbell and Stanley, analysis methods were proposed by Box and Tiao in 1975, and more recent treatments are easily found (Box et al., 2016). But this approach to causal inference can be badly overmatched by the data on handgun sales, especially when the causal effects are estimated. More important for this paper are fundamental oversights in the standard statistical methods employed. Test multiplicity problems are introduced by adaptive model selection built into recommended practice. The challenges are computational and conceptual. Some progress is made on both problems that arguably improves on past research, but the take-home message may be to reduce aspirations about what can be learned.
翻译:媒体中有许多要求,对枪支销售差异的原因也进行了一些值得尊敬的研究。因果推断的挑战可能相当艰巨。本文报告对1996年至2018年加利福尼亚州每日手枪销售情况的分析,使用了中断的时间序列设计和分析。1963年坎贝尔和斯坦利向社会科学家介绍了设计,1975年Box和Tiao提出了分析方法,最近也很容易找到治疗方法(Box等人,2016年)。但是,这种因果推断方法可能因手枪销售数据而大相径庭,特别是在估计因果影响时。对于本文来说,更重要的是对所采用的标准统计方法的基本监督。通过将适应性模型的选择纳入建议的做法,提出了测试的多重问题。挑战在于计算和概念。在两个问题上都取得了一些进展,这些进展在以往的研究中可以说有所改进,但取自信息可能是减少对可以学到的东西的渴望。