Online communities, like Wikipedia, produce valuable public information goods. Whereas some of these communities require would-be contributors to create accounts, many do not. Does this requirement catalyze cooperation or inhibit participation? Prior research provides divergent predictions but little causal evidence. We conduct an empirical test using longitudinal data from 136 natural experiments where would-be contributors to wikis were suddenly required to log in to contribute. Requiring accounts leads to a small increase in account creation, but reduces both high- and low-quality contributions from registered and unregistered participants. Although the change deters a large portion of low-quality participation, the vast majority of deterred contributions are of higher quality. We conclude that requiring accounts introduces an undertheorized tradeoff for public goods production in interactive communication systems.
翻译:在线社区,如维基百科,生产有价值的公共信息产品。虽然其中一些社区需要潜在捐款者创建账户,但许多社区没有这样做。这一要求是否催化合作或抑制参与?先前的研究提供了不同的预测,但几乎没有因果关系证据。我们利用136个自然实验的纵向数据进行了经验测试,其中突然要求潜在捐款者维基用户登录入帐。要求账户导致账户创建小幅增长,但减少了注册和未注册参与者的高质量和低质量捐款。尽管这一变化抑制了很大一部分低质量参与,但绝大多数受遏制的捐款质量较高。我们的结论是,要求账户为互动通信系统中的公益品生产引入了低于理论的权衡交易。