The HCI field has seen a growing body of qualitative research, making use of a wide range of activities and methods. Interviews and workshops are some of the main techniques used to help understand user needs and to conduct co-design activities with them. However, these methods might be conducted in various ways and have different advantage and disadvantages. An important aspect influencing the types of activities and methods used is the culture of research participants. This paper aims to compare the research methods conducted in the context of the Saudi Arabian culture. It provides a reflection on the methods used to understand user needs when designing social commerce platforms, including interviews, co-design workshops and critique design workshops. We found that each method has its positives and negatives in terms of user preferences, and can help to obtain useful information at different levels of detail. For example, conducting semi-structured interviews by text was preferred by participants who are at home with their families. However, they can be slower than other methods.
翻译:健康倡议领域出现了越来越多的定性研究,利用了广泛的活动和方法,访谈和讲习班是用来帮助理解用户需要和与他们共同设计活动的一些主要技术,但是,这些方法可能以不同方式进行,具有不同的利弊,影响所使用活动和方法的一个重要方面是研究参与者的文化,本文件旨在比较沙特阿拉伯文化范围内进行的研究方法,对设计社会商业平台,包括访谈、共同设计讲习班和评论设计讲习班时用于了解用户需要的方法进行反思,我们发现,每种方法在用户偏好方面都有其积极和消极之处,有助于在不同的详细程度上获得有用的信息,例如,与家人住在一起的参与者倾向于用文字进行半结构式的访谈,但比其他方法要慢。