In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, educational institutions quickly transitioned to remote learning. The problem of how to perform student assessment in an online environment has become increasingly relevant, leading many institutions and educators to turn to online proctoring services to administer remote exams. These services employ various student monitoring methods to curb cheating, including restricted ("lockdown") browser modes, video/screen monitoring, local network traffic analysis, and eye tracking. In this paper, we explore the security and privacy perceptions of the student test-takers being proctored. We analyze user reviews of proctoring services' browser extensions and subsequently perform an online survey (n=102). Our findings indicate that participants are concerned about both the amount and the personal nature of the information shared with the exam proctoring companies. However, many participants also recognize a trade-off between pandemic safety concerns and the arguably invasive means by which proctoring services ensure exam integrity. Our findings also suggest that institutional power dynamics and students' trust in their institutions may dissuade students' opposition to remote proctoring.
翻译:针对Covid-19大流行,教育机构迅速过渡到远程学习。如何在网上环境中进行学生评估的问题越来越重要,导致许多机构和教育工作者转向在线激励服务来管理远程考试。这些服务采用各种学生监测方法来遏制欺骗行为,包括限制(“锁住”)浏览器模式、视频/屏幕监测、本地网络交通分析以及眼睛跟踪。在本文件中,我们探讨了学生测试对象的安全和隐私概念。我们分析了测试服务的浏览器扩展用户审查,随后进行了在线调查(n=102)。我们的调查结果表明,参与者既关心与测试测试公司共享的信息的数量和个人性质,也关心与测试公司共享的信息的量和个人性质。然而,许多参与者也认识到大流行病安全关切与激励服务确保考试完整性的可争议入侵手段之间的权衡。我们的调查结果还表明,机构权力动态和学生对机构的信任可能会劝阻学生反对远程激励。