Congestion control is essential for the stability of the Internet and the corresponding algorithms are commonly evaluated for interoperability based on flow-rate fairness. In contrast, video conferencing software such as Zoom uses custom congestion control algorithms whose fairness behavior is mostly unknown. Aggravatingly, video conferencing has recently seen a drastic increase in use - partly caused by the COVID-19 pandemic - and could hence negatively affect how available Internet resources are shared. In this paper, we thus investigate the flow-rate fairness of video conferencing congestion control at the example of Zoom and influences of deploying AQM. We find that Zoom is slow to react to bandwidth changes and uses two to three times the bandwidth of TCP in low-bandwidth scenarios. Moreover, also when competing with delay aware congestion control such as BBR, we see high queuing delays. AQM reduces these queuing delays and can equalize the bandwidth use when used with flow-queuing. However, it then introduces high packet loss for Zoom, leaving the question how delay and loss affect Zoom's QoE. We hence show a preliminary user study in the appendix which indicates that the QoE is at least not improved and should be studied further.
翻译:对于互联网的稳定来说,控制拥挤是关键,相应的算法通常根据流速公平性来评估互操作性。相比之下,Zomom等电视会议软件使用定制拥堵控制算法,而这种算法的公平行为大多不为人知。更严重的是,电视会议最近看到使用量急剧增加,部分是由于COVID-19大流行造成的,因此可能对共享现有互联网资源产生消极影响。在本文中,我们因此调查了电视会议拥堵控制流率的公平性,以Zoom为例,以及部署AQM的影响。我们发现,Zom对带宽变化的反应迟缓,在低带宽度情景下使用TCP的带宽度为2至3倍。此外,在意识到如BBR这样的延迟控制时,我们看到了高排气延迟。AQM可以减少这些挤压延迟,并在使用流压时使带宽度使用达到等量。然而,它又给Zoom带来高的包损失,使得问题如何影响Zom'm的宽度变化,在低带宽度情景下使用2至3倍的带宽频带宽带宽带宽带宽。此外,我们在初步的用户研究中显示,应该进一步研究中显示,在QE是改进的附录。我们。