Ethicists, policy-makers, and the general public have questioned whether artificial entities such as robots warrant rights or other forms of moral consideration. There is little synthesis of the research on this topic so far. We identify 294 relevant research or discussion items in our literature review of this topic. There is widespread agreement among scholars that some artificial entities could warrant moral consideration in the future, if not also the present. The reasoning varies, such as concern for the effects on artificial entities and concern for the effects on human society. Beyond the conventional consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethicist ethical frameworks, some scholars encourage "information ethics" and "social-relational" approaches, though there are opportunities for more in-depth ethical research on the nuances of moral consideration of artificial entities. There is limited relevant empirical data collection, primarily in a few psychological studies on current moral and social attitudes of humans towards robots and other artificial entities. This suggests an important gap for social science research on how artificial entities will be integrated into society and the factors that will determine how the interests of sentient artificial entities are considered.
翻译:伦理学家、决策者和一般公众质疑机器人等人造实体是否应当享有权利或其他形式的道德考虑。迄今为止,对这一专题的研究很少进行综合分析。我们在对这一专题的文献审查中确定了294项相关研究或讨论项目。学者普遍认为,一些人造实体今后甚至现在都值得道德考虑。推理各有不同,例如关注对人造实体的影响和关注对人类社会的影响。除了传统的结果主义、道德伦理学和道德伦理学框架外,一些学者鼓励“信息道德”和“社会关系”方法,尽管有机会对人造实体道德考虑的微妙之处进行更深入的伦理研究。相关的实证数据收集有限,主要是关于人类目前对机器人和其他人造实体的道德和社会态度的少数心理研究。这说明社会科学研究在如何将人造实体纳入社会以及决定如何考虑人造实体利益的因素方面存在重大差距。