Purpose of Review: Negative controls are a powerful tool to detect and adjust for bias in epidemiological research. This paper introduces negative controls to a broader audience and provides guidance on principled design and causal analysis based on a formal negative control framework. Recent Findings: We review and summarize causal and statistical assumptions, practical strategies, and validation criteria that can be combined with subject matter knowledge to perform negative control analyses. We also review existing statistical methodologies for detection, reduction, and correction of confounding bias, and briefly discuss recent advances towards nonparametric identification of causal effects in a double negative control design. Summary: There is great potential for valid and accurate causal inference leveraging contemporary healthcare data in which negative controls are routinely available. Design and analysis of observational data leveraging negative controls is an area of growing interest in health and social sciences. Despite these developments, further effort is needed to disseminate these novel methods to ensure they are adopted by practicing epidemiologists.
翻译:审查的目的:消极控制是发现和调整流行病学研究偏见的有力工具;本文件向更广泛的受众介绍消极控制,并就原则设计和基于正式消极控制框架的因果关系分析提供指导; 最近的调查结果:我们审查并总结因果关系和统计假设、实际战略和验证标准,这些假设和统计假设可以与主题知识相结合,以进行消极控制分析;我们还审查现有统计方法,以发现、减少和纠正相互混淆的偏见,并简要讨论最近在双重消极控制设计中对因果关系的非对称识别方面取得的进展; 概述:利用经常有负面控制手段的当代保健数据,极有可能进行有效和准确的因果关系推断; 设计和分析利用消极控制手段的观察数据,这是卫生和社会科学中一个越来越感兴趣的领域; 尽管这些发展,我们仍需要进一步努力传播这些新方法,以确保实践流行病学者采用这些新方法。