This paper synthesizes recent advances in the econometrics of difference-in-differences (DiD) and provides concrete recommendations for practitioners. We begin by articulating a simple set of "canonical" assumptions under which the econometrics of DiD are well-understood. We then argue that recent advances in DiD methods can be broadly classified as relaxing some components of the canonical DiD setup, with a focus on $(i)$ multiple periods and variation in treatment timing, $(ii)$ potential violations of parallel trends, or $(iii)$ alternative frameworks for inference. Our discussion highlights the different ways that the DiD literature has advanced beyond the canonical model, and helps to clarify when each of the papers will be relevant for empirical work. We conclude by discussing some promising areas for future research.
翻译:本文综合了不同差异的计量经济学(DID)的最新进展,并为实践者提供了具体建议。我们首先阐述了一套简单的“卡门主义”假设,根据这些假设,DiD的计量经济学非常清楚。然后我们争辩说,DiD方法的最新进展可以被广泛归类为放松Canonic DiD设置的某些组成部分,重点是(一)美元多期和治疗时间的变异,可能违反平行趋势的(二)美元,或可能违反平行趋势的(三)美元替代推断框架。我们的讨论强调了DiD文献在Canonic模型之外所推进的不同方法,并有助于澄清每份文件何时都与实证工作相关。我们最后通过讨论未来研究的一些有希望的领域。