Diversity in personalized news recommender systems is often defined as dissimilarity, and based on topic diversity (e.g., corona versus farmers strike). Diversity in news media, however, is understood as multiperspectivity (e.g., different opinions on corona measures), and arguably a key responsibility of the press in a democratic society. While viewpoint diversity is often considered synonymous with source diversity in communication science domain, in this paper, we take a computational view. We operationalize the notion of framing, adopted from communication science. We apply this notion to a re-ranking of topic-relevant recommended lists, to form the basis of a novel viewpoint diversification method. Our offline evaluation indicates that the proposed method is capable of enhancing the viewpoint diversity of recommendation lists according to a diversity metric from literature. In an online study, on the Blendle platform, a Dutch news aggregator platform, with more than 2000 users, we found that users are willing to consume viewpoint diverse news recommendations. We also found that presentation characteristics significantly influence the reading behaviour of diverse recommendations. These results suggest that future research on presentation aspects of recommendations can be just as important as novel viewpoint diversification methods to truly achieve multiperspectivity in online news environments.
翻译:个人化新闻建议系统的多样性往往被定义为不同,基于主题多样性(如 Corona 与农民罢工),个人化新闻建议系统的多样性往往被定义为不同。然而,新闻媒体的多样性被理解为多面性(如对corona措施的不同见解),并可以说是民主社会新闻界的一项关键责任。虽然观点多样性通常被视为通信科学领域多样性的来源多样性的同义词,但本文中我们采用了一种计算观点。我们从通信科学中采纳了构建概念。我们将这一概念应用于与主题相关的建议清单的重新排序,以形成新观点多样化方法的基础。我们的离线评估表明,拟议方法能够根据文学的多样性指标加强建议清单的多样性观点。在Bledle平台上,荷兰新闻聚合平台,有2000多个用户,我们发现用户愿意采纳不同新闻建议。我们还认为,演示特征对不同建议阅读行为有着重大影响。这些结果表明,未来关于建议表述方面的研究可以像新观点一样,在网上实现多面图象。