This paper aims to gain a better understanding of the perspectives of contributors to Spanish academic journals regarding open access, open peer review, and altmetrics. It also explores how age, gender, professional experience, career history, and perception and use of social media influence authors opinions toward these developments in scholarly publishing. A sample of contributors (n-1254) to Spanish academic journals was invited to participate in a survey about the aforementioned topics. The response rate was 24 per cent (n-295). Contributors to Spanish scholarly journals hold a favourable opinion of open access but were more cautious about open peer review and altmetrics. Younger and female scholars were more reluctant to accept open peer review practices. A positive attitude toward social networks did not necessarily translate into enthusiasm for emerging trends in scholarly publishing. Despite this, ResearchGate users were more aware of altmetrics.
翻译:本文旨在更好地了解西班牙学术期刊撰稿人关于开放存取、公开同行审查和利他学的观点,探讨年龄、性别、专业经验、职业历史、以及社会媒体的观念和使用如何影响作者对这些学术出版发展的意见,邀请西班牙学术期刊的撰稿人(n-1254)参加关于上述专题的调查,答复率为24%(n-295),西班牙学术期刊的撰稿人对开放存取持积极看法,但对开放同行审查和利他学持更谨慎的态度,Younger和女学者更不愿意接受公开同行审查的做法,对社会网络的积极态度不一定转化为对学术出版方面新趋势的热情,尽管如此,研究Gate用户对利他学更了解。