This paper reports an investigation into the problem of rapid identification of a channel that crosses a body of water using one or more Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USV). A new algorithm called Proposal Based Adaptive Channel Search (PBACS) is presented as a potential solution that improves upon current methods. The empirical performance of PBACS is compared to lawnmower surveying and to Markov decision process (MDP) planning with two state-of-the-art reward functions: Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) and Maximum Value Information (MVI). The performance of each method is evaluated through comparison of the time it takes to identify a continuous channel through an area, using one, two, three, or four USVs. The performance of each method is compared across ten simulated bathymetry scenarios and one field area, each with different channel layouts. The results from simulations and field trials indicate that on average multi-vehicle PBACS outperforms lawnmower, UCB, and MVI based methods, especially when at least three vehicles are used.
翻译:本文报告对迅速查明使用一种或多种无人驾驶的表层车辆穿过水体的通道的问题进行调查。一个新的算法称为“基于建议的适应性通道搜索”(PBACS),作为改进目前方法的一种潜在解决办法。PBACS的经验性表现与草坪测量和Markov决策程序(MDP)相比,后者有两种最先进的奖励功能:高置信库和最高值信息。每种方法的性能都通过比较来评价,用1、2、3或4个USV确定一个区域连续通道所需的时间。每种方法的性能都比较了10个模拟测深情景和1个实地区域,每个地区都有不同的频道布局。模拟和实地试验的结果显示,在平均多车型PBACS超过法模、UCB和基于MVI的方法方面,特别是在至少使用3辆车辆的情况下。