Contact tracing apps have become one of the main approaches to control and slow down the spread of COVID-19 and ease up lockdown measures. While these apps can be very effective in stopping the transmission chain and saving lives, their adoption remains under the expected critical mass. The public debate about contact tracing apps emphasizes general privacy reservations and is conducted at an expert level, but lacks the user perspective related to actual designs. To address this gap, we explore user preferences for contact tracing apps using market research techniques, and specifically conjoint analysis. Our main contributions are empirical insights into individual and group preferences, as well as insights for prescriptive design. While our results confirm the privacy-preserving design of most European contact tracing apps, they also provide a more nuanced understanding of acceptable features. Based on market simulation and variation analysis, we conclude that adding goal-congruent features will play an important role in fostering mass adoption.
翻译:联系追踪应用程序已成为控制并减缓COVID-19扩散和缓解封闭措施的主要办法之一,虽然这些应用程序在阻止传输链和拯救生命方面可以非常有效,但其采用仍然处于预期的临界水平。关于联系追踪应用程序的公开辩论强调一般隐私保留,在专家一级进行,但缺乏与实际设计有关的用户视角。为了解决这一差距,我们探索用户选择使用市场研究技术,特别是联合分析,进行联系追踪应用程序的偏好。我们的主要贡献是对个人和群体偏好的实证洞察力,以及对规范设计的洞察力。虽然我们的结果证实了大多数欧洲联系追踪应用程序的隐私保护设计,但它们也提供了对可接受特征的更细致的了解。基于市场模拟和变异分析,我们得出结论,增加目标连接特征将在促进大众采纳方面发挥重要作用。