We study pure coordination games where in every outcome, all players have identical payoffs, 'win' or 'lose'. We identify and discuss a range of 'purely rational principles' guiding the reasoning of rational players in such games and analyze which classes of coordination games can be solved by such players with no preplay communication or conventions. We observe that it is highly nontrivial to delineate a boundary between purely rational principles and other decision methods, such as conventions, for solving such coordination games.
翻译:我们研究纯粹的协调游戏, 在每个结果中, 所有玩家都有相同的回报, “ 赢 ” 或 “ 结束 ” 。 我们确定并讨论一系列“ 纯理性原则 ”, 指导这些游戏中理性玩家的理性思维, 分析哪些类型的协调游戏可以由这些玩家解决, 而没有前戏交流或惯例。 我们认为,在纯粹理性原则和其他决策方法(如公约)之间划定界线, 以解决这种协调游戏, 是非常没有价值的。