Measure user experience in MR (i.e., AR/VR) user studies is essential. Researchers apply a wide range of measuring methods using objective (e.g., biosignals, time logging), behavioral (e.g., gaze direction, movement amplitude), and subjective (e.g., standardized questionnaires) metrics. Many of these measurement instruments were adapted from use-cases outside of MR but have not been validated for usage in MR experiments. However, researchers are faced with various challenges and design alternatives when measuring immersive experiences. These challenges become even more diverse when running out-of-the lab studies. Measurement methods of VR experience recently received much attention. For example, research has started embedding questionnaires in the VE for various applications, allowing users to stay closer to the ongoing experience while filling out the survey. However, there is a diversity in the interaction methods and practices on how the assessment procedure is conducted. This diversity in methods underlines a missing shared agreement of standardized measurement tools for VR experiences. AR research strongly orients on the research methods from VR, e.g., using the same type of subjective questionnaires. However, some crucial technical differences require careful considerations during the evaluation. This workshop at CHI 2021 provides a foundation to exchange expertise and address challenges and opportunities of research methods in MR user studies. By this, our workshop launches a discussion of research methods that should lead to standardizing assessment methods in MR user studies. The outcomes of the workshop will be aggregated into a collective special issue journal article.
翻译:测量用户在MR(即AR/VR)用户研究方面的测量经验至关重要。研究人员采用多种测量方法,使用客观(例如生物信号、时间记录)、行为(例如目视方向、运动振幅)和主观(例如标准化问卷)衡量指标,其中许多衡量工具是从MR(即AR/VR)以外的使用案例改编而来的,但没有在MR实验中使用。然而,研究人员在测量初步经验时面临各种挑战并设计替代方法。这些挑战在实验室研究外,更加多样化。最近,对VR(例如生物信号、时间记录)、行为(例如目视方向、运动振幅)和主观(例如标准化问卷)衡量方法的衡量方法受到极大关注。例如,研究已经开始将问卷纳入VR(例如生物信号、时间记录记录)、行为(例如)经验计量方法的计量方法纳入VR(例如生物信号)中,使用户在填写调查时能够更接近现有经验。然而,在进行这种标准结果研究时,需要有一个关键的方法和做法的多样性。在进行一项基础性研究时,在进行这一类的用户研究中,在进行这一类的用户研究时,在进行一项关键的研究时,在进行一项基础研究时,在进行一项基础研究时,需要的研究中,在进行一项关键的方法的研究中,在进行一项基础研究时,在进行一项基础研究时,在进行一项关键的方法研究时需要的研究中,在进行一项基础研究的研究中,在进行一项技术研究时,在进行一项基础研究时,在进行一项基础研究时,需要研究时,应该提供一种关键的方法。