Research artifact sharing is known to strengthen the transparency of scientific studies. However, in the lack of common discipline-specific guidelines for artifacts evaluation, subjective and conflicting expectations may happen and threaten artifact quality. In this paper, we discuss our preliminary ideas for a framework based on quality management principles (5W2H) that can aid in the establishment of common guidelines for artifact evaluation and sharing. Also, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, we discuss how research communities could join efforts to aid the guidelines' adequacy to research priorities. These combined methodologies constitute a novelty for software engineering research which can foster research software sustainability.
翻译：众所周知,分享研究文物可加强科学研究的透明度,然而,由于缺乏针对学科的关于文物评价的共同准则,主观和相互矛盾的期望可能会发生,并威胁到文物质量。在本文件中,我们讨论了我们关于基于质量管理原则(5W2H)的框架的初步想法,该框架可以帮助建立文物评价和共享的共同准则。此外,我们利用分析等级进程,讨论研究界如何共同努力,帮助准则符合研究优先事项。这些综合方法构成了软件工程研究的新颖之处,可以促进研究软件的可持续性。
相关内容
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员