Since COVID-19 vaccines became available, no studies have quantified how different disaster evacuation strategies can mitigate pandemic risks in shelters. Therefore, we applied an age-structured epidemiological model, known as the Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) model, to investigate to what extent different vaccine uptake levels and the Diversion protocol implemented in Taiwan decrease infections and delay pandemic peak occurrences. Taiwan's Diversion protocol involves diverting those in self-quarantine due to exposure, thus preventing them from mingling with the general public at a congregate shelter. The Diversion protocol, combined with sufficient vaccine uptake, can decrease the maximum number of infections and delay outbreaks relative to scenarios without such strategies. When the diversion of all exposed people is not possible, or vaccine uptake is insufficient, the Diversion protocol is still valuable. Furthermore, a group of evacuees that consists primarily of a young adult population tends to experience pandemic peak occurrences sooner and have up to 180% more infections than does a majority elderly group when the Diversion protocol is implemented. However, when the Diversion protocol is not enforced, the majority elderly group suffers from up to 20% more severe cases than the majority young adult group.
翻译:自获得COVID-19疫苗以来,没有研究量化了不同灾害疏散战略如何减轻收容所的流行病风险,因此,我们采用了一个年龄结构的流行病学模型,称为“感知-受开发-传染病恢复(SEIR)”模型,以调查在台湾实施的不同疫苗吸收水平和转移议定书在多大程度上在台湾减少感染和推迟流行病高峰发生。台湾的排污议定书涉及因接触而转移那些因接触而处于自我隔离状态的人,从而阻止他们与普通大众在集中收容所混杂在一起。转用议定书,加上足够的疫苗吸收,可以减少最大感染人数,并比没有这种战略的情景推迟爆发。当所有受感染者无法转移,或疫苗摄取不足时,转用议定书仍然具有价值。此外,主要由年轻成年人组成的一群被疏散者往往更早地经历流行病高峰,其感染率比执行《转化议定书》时多数老年人群体高出180 %。然而,如果不执行这种排污议定书,多数老年人群体在不执行这种议定书的情况下,其感染人数会达到20 %,超过多数群体。