Our understanding of intelligence is directed primarily at the human level. This paper attempts to give a more unifying definition that can be applied to the natural world in general and then Artificial Intelligence. The definition would be used more to verify a relative intelligence, not to quantify it and might help when making judgements on the matter. While correct behaviour is the preferred definition, a metric that is grounded in Kolmogorov's Complexity Theory is suggested, which leads to a measurement about entropy. A version of an accepted AI test is then put forward as the 'acid test' and might be what a free-thinking program would try to achieve. Recent work by the author has been more from a direction of mechanical processes, or ones that might operate automatically. This paper agrees that intelligence is a pro-active event, but also notes a second aspect to it that is in the background and mechanical. The paper suggests looking at intelligence and the conscious as being slightly different, where consciousness is this more mechanical aspect. In fact, a surprising conclusion can be a passive but intelligent brain being invoked by active and less intelligent senses.
翻译:我们对于情报的理解主要针对人类层面。 本文试图给出一个更统一的定义, 适用于整个自然世界, 然后是人工智能。 定义将更多地用于核查相对的智慧, 而不是量化, 并且可能有助于对此问题做出判断。 虽然正确的行为是首选的定义, 但建议了一种基于科尔莫戈罗夫复杂理论的衡量标准, 从而导致对昆虫的测量。 接受的 AI 测试的版本随后作为“ 酸测试” 提出, 可能是自由思考方案要达到的目标。 作者最近的工作更多地来自机械过程的方向, 或可能自动操作的。 本文认为, 情报是一个积极的事件, 但也指出在背景和机械方面的另一个方面。 文件建议, 将智慧和意识看成是略有不同的, 意识是这个更机械的方面。 事实上, 一个令人惊讶的结论可能是被动但智能的大脑, 被积极和不聪明的意识所引用。