Yelp ratings are often viewed as a reputation metric for local businesses. In this paper we study how Yelp ratings evolve over time. Our main finding is that on average the first ratings that businesses receive overestimate their eventual reputation. In particular, the first review that a business receives in our dataset averages 4.1 stars, while the 20th review averages just 3.69 stars. This significant warm-start bias which may be attributed to the limited exposure of a business in its first steps may mask analysis performed on ratings and reputational ramifications. Therefore, we study techniques to identify and correct for this bias. Further, we perform a case study to explore the effect of a Groupon deal on the merchant's subsequent ratings and show both that previous research has overestimated Groupon's effect to merchants' reputation and that average ratings anticorrelate with the number of reviews received. Our analysis points to the importance of identifying and removing biases from Yelp reviews.
翻译:Yelp评级通常被视为当地企业的声誉衡量标准。在本文中,我们研究了Yelp评级如何随时间演变。我们的主要结论是,平均而言,企业得到的第一批评级高估了最终的声誉。特别是,企业在我们的数据集中收到的第一次审查平均为4.1个星,而第20次审查平均仅为3.69个星。由于企业在最初步骤中暴露的机会有限,这种重大的热点启动偏差可能掩盖了对评级和声誉影响的分析。因此,我们研究了查明和纠正这一偏差的方法。此外,我们进行了一项案例研究,以探讨集团交易对商人随后的评级的影响,并表明以往的研究高估了集团对商人声誉的影响,平均评级与收到的审查数量相比都存在反差。我们的分析指出,必须查明并消除对Yelp审查的偏差。