The business model of many mobile apps is based on generating revenue from sharing user data with ad networks and other companies to deliver personalized ads. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) gives California residents a right to opt out of the selling and sharing of their personal information. In two experiments we evaluate to which extent popular apps on the Android platform enable California residents to exercise their CCPA opt-out right. In our first experiment -- manually exercising the opt-out right via app-level UIs for a set of 100 apps -- we find that only 48 apps implement the legally mandated setting, which suggests that CCPA opt-out right non-compliance is a broader issue on the platform. In our second experiment -- automatically exercising the opt-out right at the platform-level by sending Global Privacy Control (GPC) signals -- we find for an app dataset of $1,811$ apps that GPC is largely ineffective. While we estimate with 95% confidence that 62%--81% of apps in our app dataset must respect the CCPA's opt-out right, many apps do not do so. Disabling apps' access to the AdID, which is not intended for exercising the CCPA opt-out right but could have practical effect in this regard, does not lead to a different result. For example, when sending GPC signals and disabling apps' access to the AdID, 338 apps still had the ccpa status of the ad network Vungle set to opted in while only 26 had set it to opted out. Overall, our results suggest a compliance gap as California residents have no effective way of exercising their CCPA opt-out right on the Android platform; neither at the app- nor at the platform-level. We think that re-purposing the Android AdID setting as an opt-out right setting with legal meaning could resolve this compliance gap under the CCPA and other laws and improve users' privacy on the platform overall.
翻译:许多移动应用的商业模式依赖于与广告网络及其他公司共享用户数据以提供个性化广告,从而产生收入。《加州消费者隐私法案》(CCPA)赋予加州居民退出其个人信息销售与共享的权利。我们通过两项实验评估了Android平台上主流应用在多大程度上支持加州居民行使CCPA退出权。在第一项实验中——通过手动操作100款应用内的用户界面行使退出权——我们发现仅有48款应用实现了法律要求的设置,这表明CCPA退出权在该平台上的合规性存在普遍问题。在第二项实验中——通过发送全球隐私控制(GPC)信号在平台层面自动行使退出权——我们对1,811款应用的数据集进行分析,发现GPC机制基本无效。虽然我们以95%的置信度估计数据集中62%至81%的应用本应遵守CCPA退出权规定,但许多应用并未执行。禁用应用对广告标识符(AdID)的访问权限(该设置虽非专为行使CCPA退出权设计,但可能产生实际影响)也未带来不同结果。例如,在发送GPC信号并禁用AdID访问权限后,仍有338款应用将广告网络Vungle的CCPA状态设为“已加入”,而仅有26款设为“已退出”。总体而言,我们的研究揭示了合规性缺口:加州居民在Android平台上缺乏有效行使CCPA退出权的途径——无论是在应用层面还是平台层面。我们认为,将Android广告标识符设置重新定义为具有法律效力的退出权设置,可能弥合CCPA及其他法律框架下的合规性缺口,并整体提升该平台的用户隐私保护水平。