Science has become more collaborative over the past years, a phenomenon that is related to the increase in the number of authors per paper and the emergence of interdisciplinary works featuring specialists of different fields. In such a environment, it is not trivial to quantify the individual impact of researchers. Here we analyze how the most prolific collaboration tie (in terms of co-produced works) of an established researcher influences their productivity and visibility metrics. In particular, we check how the number of produced works, citations and h-index rank of an researcher changes when their works also coauthored by their prolific collaborators are not considered. We observed different patterns of prolific collaborator influence across the major fields of knowledge. More specifically, in formal and applied sciences, the prolific collaborators seem to play an important role to the visibility metrics of authors even when they are among the highly cited. Such a results can help stakeholders to better understand the collaboration patterns and draw measures of success that also consider collaboration ties.
翻译:过去几年来,科学已变得更具有协作性,这种现象与每篇论文作者人数的增加和不同领域专家的跨学科作品的出现有关。在这种环境中,量化研究人员的个人影响并非微不足道。在这里,我们分析现有研究人员最大量的合作(在共同制作的作品方面)如何(在共同制作的作品方面)影响其生产力和可见度衡量标准。特别是,当研究人员的作品也由其丰富合作者共同编写时,我们如何考虑其作品的数量、引文和指数等级的变化。我们观察到了主要知识领域的不同模式,具体地说,在正规和应用科学中,高产合作者似乎对作者的可见度指标起着重要作用,即使他们属于高被引用者之列。这种结果可以帮助利益攸关方更好地了解合作模式和衡量成功程度,同时也考虑到协作关系。