Many mobile apps' business model is based on sharing user data with ad networks to deliver personalized ads. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) gives California residents a right to opt out. In two experiments we evaluate to which extent popular Android apps enable California residents to exercise their right. In our first experiment -- manually exercising the right via app-level UIs -- we find that only 48 out of 100 apps implement a respective setting, which suggests that CCPA opt-out right compliance on the Android platform is generally low. In our second experiment -- automatically exercising the opt-out right by sending Global Privacy Control (GPC) signals -- we find for an app dataset of 1,811 apps that GPC is largely ineffective. While we estimate with 95% confidence that 62%--81% of apps in our app dataset must respect the CCPA opt-out right, many apps do not do so. Our evaluation of disabling apps' access to the AdID -- which is technically not intended for exercising the CCPA opt-out right but could be practically effective -- does not change our conclusion. For example, when sending GPC signals and disabling apps' access to the AdID, 338 apps still had the ccpa status of the ad network Vungle set to opted_in while only 26 had set it to opted_out. Overall, our results suggest a compliance gap as California residents have no effective way of exercising their CCPA opt-out right on the Android platform; neither at the app nor at the platform-level. We think that re-purposing the Android AdID setting as an opt-out right setting with legal meaning under the CCPA and other laws could close this gap and improve users' privacy on the platform significantly.
翻译:许多移动应用的商业模式依赖于与广告网络共享用户数据以提供个性化广告。加州消费者隐私法案(CCPA)赋予加州居民退出该数据共享的权利。我们通过两项实验评估了主流Android应用在多大程度上支持加州居民行使这一权利。在第一项实验中——通过应用级用户界面手动行使权利——我们发现100款应用中仅有48款实现了相关设置,这表明Android平台上CCPA退出权的合规性普遍较低。在第二项实验中——通过发送全球隐私控制(GPC)信号自动行使退出权——我们对1,811款应用的数据集分析发现GPC基本无效。虽然我们以95%的置信度估计数据集中62%至81%的应用应遵守CCPA退出权规定,但许多应用并未执行。我们对禁用应用访问广告标识符(AdID)的评估——该技术虽非CCPA退出权的设计用途但可能具有实际效果——并未改变我们的结论。例如,在发送GPC信号并禁用AdID访问后,仍有338款应用将广告网络Vungle的CCPA状态设为opted_in,而仅有26款设为opted_out。总体而言,我们的结果表明存在合规缺口:加州居民在Android平台上缺乏行使CCPA退出权的有效途径,无论是应用层面还是系统层面。我们认为,将Android的AdID设置重新定义为具有CCPA及其他法律意义的退出权设置,可能填补这一缺口并显著提升该平台的用户隐私保护水平。