爱思唯尔提供信息分析解决方案和数字化工具,包括研究战略管理、研发绩效、临床决策支持、专业教育等。其前身可追溯自16世纪,而现代公司则起于1880年,爱思唯尔出版2500余种期刊,包括《柳叶刀》、《四面体》、《细胞》以及教科书《格雷氏解剖学》等。每年共有350,000篇论文发表在爱思唯尔公司出版的期刊中,以及全世界最大的摘要和引文数据库Scopus等。爱思唯尔(Elsevier)是医学与其他科学文献出版社之一,2016年中国高被引学者榜单的研究数据来自爱思唯尔旗下的Scopus数据库,共有来自社会科学、物理、化学、数学、经济等38个学科的1776名有世界影响力的中国学者入选。学术出版业巨头爱思唯尔(Elsevier)正式发布2017年中国高被引学者(Chinese Most Cited Researchers)榜单,本次国内共有1793位学者入选。

最新论文

During the last two decades, India has emerged as a major knowledge producer in the world, however different reports put it at different ranks, varying from 3rd to 9th places. The recent commissioned study reports of Department of Science and Technology (DST) done by Elsevier and Clarivate Analytics, rank India at 5thand 9th places, respectively. On the other hand, an independent report by National Science Foundation (NSF) of United States (US), ranks India at 3rd place on research output in Science and Engineering area. Interestingly, both, the Elsevier and the NSF reports use Scopus data, and yet surprisingly their outcomes are different. This article, therefore, attempts to investigate as to how the use of same database can still produce different outcomes, due to differences in methodological approaches. The publication counting method used and the subject selection approach are the two main exogenous factors identified to cause these variations. The implications of the analytical outcomes are discussed with special focus on policy perspectives.

0
0
下载
预览
Top