We evaluate TCP BBRv3 on Wi-Fi 6 home networks under modern AQM schemes using a fully wireless testbed and a simple cross-layer model linking Wi-Fi scheduling, router queueing, and BBRv3's pacing dynamics. Comparing BBR Internet traffic with CUBIC across different AQMs (FIFO, FQ-CoDel, and CAKE) for uplink, downlink, and bidirectional traffic, we find that FIFO destabilizes pacing and raises delay, often letting CUBIC dominate; FQ-CoDel restores fairness and controls latency; and CAKE delivers the best overall performance by keeping delay low and aligning BBRv3's sending and delivered rates. We also identify a Wi-Fi-specific effect where CAKE's rapid queue draining, while improving pacing alignment, can trigger brief retransmission bursts during BBRv3's bandwidth probes. These results follow from the interaction of variable Wi-Fi service rates, AQM delay control, and BBRv3's inflight limits, leading to practical guidance to use FQ-CoDel or CAKE and avoid unmanaged FIFO in home Wi-Fi, with potential for Wi-Fi-aware tuning of BBRv3's probing.


翻译:我们利用全无线测试平台以及一个连接Wi-Fi调度、路由器排队和BBRv3调步动态的简单跨层模型,评估了现代AQM方案下TCP BBRv3在Wi-Fi 6家庭网络中的表现。通过比较BBR与CUBIC在上行、下行和双向流量中,在不同AQM(FIFO、FQ-CoDel和CAKE)下的互联网流量性能,我们发现:FIFO会破坏调步稳定性并增加延迟,常使CUBIC占据优势;FQ-CoDel能恢复公平性并控制延迟;而CAKE通过保持低延迟并使BBRv3的发送速率与交付速率对齐,实现了最佳的整体性能。我们还识别出一种Wi-Fi特有的效应:CAKE的快速队列排空在改善调步对齐的同时,可能在BBRv3的带宽探测期间触发短暂的突发重传。这些结果源于可变的Wi-Fi服务速率、AQM延迟控制和BBRv3的在途数据限制之间的相互作用,从而得出实用建议:在家庭Wi-Fi中应使用FQ-CoDel或CAKE,并避免使用未管理的FIFO,同时存在对BBRv3探测进行Wi-Fi感知调优的潜力。

0
下载
关闭预览

相关内容

网络情报(WI)是网络情报联盟(WIC)的官方期刊,WIC是一个国际组织,致力于促进网络情报时代的合作科研和工业发展。WI寻求与该领域的主要协会和国际会议合作。WI是一份同行评议的期刊,每年出版四期,电子版和纸质版都有。 官网地址:http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/wias/
Top
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员